Excess Baggage, released in theaters on August 29, 1997, attempts to blend a charming romantic comedy with a grittier crime thriller, resulting in a film that is more of a curious footnote than a cinematic classic. Starring Alicia Silverstone in a bid to transition from her Clueless persona, the film centers on her character, Emily Hope, a rebellious and spoiled heiress who stages her own kidnapping to gain her preoccupied father’s attention.
Her elaborate plan goes awry, however, when a seemingly simple car theft turns into a high-stakes entanglement with a professional car thief, Vincent Roche, played by Benicio Del Toro.
The plot spirals into a series of mismatched encounters as Emily, who is far from a helpless damsel, complicates Vincent’s life at every turn. Their forced partnership forms the core of the film, as they evade not only the authorities but also a double-crossing accomplice, Greg Kistler (Harry Connick Jr.).
The film’s energy largely hinges on this central dynamic. Del Toro’s performance is a standout, bringing a laconic, world-weary charm to the role that contrasts sharply with Silverstone’s wide-eyed, yet determined, heiress.
The supporting cast adds to the eclectic mix, with Christopher Walken delivering his signature eccentric energy as Emily’s uncle Ray.
Sally Kirkland, Michael Bowen, Leland Orser and Nicholas Tuturro round out the cast.
Alicia Silverstone in Excess Baggage (Photo/Columbia Pictures)
Reception for Excess Baggage
Excess Baggage grossed $6.3 million on its opening weekend, finishing No. 6 at the box office.
The film would gross $14.5 million in its theatrical run.
Roger Ebert gave the film three stars in his review.
Legacy
Upon its release, Excess Baggage was met with poor reviews and a lukewarm box office reception. It struggled to find its footing, bouncing between screwball comedy and a more serious crime narrative without fully committing to either. Its legacy is tied to this critical and commercial misfire, often viewed as a key example of a star vehicle that failed to ignite.
Despite this, the film has garnered a certain cult classic status among aficionados of 90s cinema, valued for its unique premise and the oddball chemistry of its leads. It stands today as a testament to the chaotic, experimental spirit of the era, and while it may not have aged into a masterpiece, it remains an entertaining, albeit flawed, piece of cinematic history.
